Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Self-centered leaders: The cause of most problems


I have read a number of business/management books, and have several on my shelves. Nowhere near as many as a lot of people, based both on those I know – in business and even more in management of medical operations and academic departments (although the first, for sure, and the second often, are basically businesses). They are obviously very popular, as there are many of them in bookstores, especially in airport bookstores; this is not surprising as such a high percentage of airport travelers are traveling on, well, business.

The reason I don’t read more of them is not actually because they are boring, which is the main reason I stop reading books. In fact, they are often well written, witty, and make good points; they are often better written and more engaging than a lot of non-fiction and fiction books. No, the reason is that they all, basically, say the same thing. They may promote themselves as being on different topics, such as negotiation, collaboration, maximizing organizational success, understanding the psychology of the workplace, etc., but really they all (or at least the good, and in some ways ironically, most successful ones) say “don’t be an asshole”. OK, I know that one of them is actually called the “No Asshole Rule”[1], but I meant it more generically, so if you want you can say “jerk” (although Sutton, the author of the latter book, is quoted as saying “other words such as bully or jerk "do not convey the same degree of awfulness".[2] Maybe I prefer “jerk” because lots of bosses are not complete assholes but are still toxic.

The main thing here is that these books are in large part written for bosses, so that they can become better bosses by working more effectively with their staff in their organizations. The amazing thing is how difficult it is to get this message through; these books keep appearing, keep selling a lot of copies, continue to be quoted widely and featured on talk shows and in speeches and, and often are cited not only by consultants (this is a big part of a consultant’s job, by the way, quoting business books) but even in meetings by the same leaders that they are aimed at – and who do not seem to be able to get the message.

I am reminded of a friend (a family physician) telling me about an interdisciplinary training session they went to (probably sponsored by the Association of American Medical Colleges, AAMC) for chairs of all different medical specialties. One of the speakers was a psychologist who was giving advice on how to gain the respect of – or at least garner better performance from – employees and colleagues, and in this case, mainly other physicians. The advice was things like “listen to other people” and “even if you are listening (or not), act as if you are – look at them, nod your head”, and sometimes just “look at them”. Pretend you care. Ask about their lives and families. Tell people they are doing a good job.

My friend, trained as a family physician in an environment (and now a leader in an environment) where every department and residency program has psychologists or other “behavioral scientists” on the faculty, and where such skills as caring and listening are central to the patient-care mission, was amazed that the speaker was giving such emphasis to such elementary and obvious material.

Until she looked around the room, and saw the other chairs, from other specialties, assiduously taking notes. She imagined them writing down “look at other people”, “act as if you are listening”, “act as if you care”. They probably were!

I don’t mean to suggest that all family physician chairs are terrific and caring, or that all other physician chairs are insensitive boors, although there is often a selection bias in who goes into different specialties. I certainly don’t mean that this problem is limited to, or even especially prevalent in physician leaders. I just use them as an example because it is the group I am familiar with. Indeed, it is likely that they have a little less of this problem than other business leaders because their attitudes are modified by caring what happens to their patients, who are in fact other people. This behavior is more obvious in hospital and health system administrators who are not health workers but MBAs and CPAs, even though they also at least pretend to care about the health of other people. I can only imagine how much worse it is in industries where caring about people is not even an ostensible consideration, where the Friedman Doctrine, “maximizing shareholder profit” is the only driver.[3]  Of course, this Doctrine is not always accepted in business; a Forbes article once called it “the world’s dumbest idea”.[4]

So why is it that all these leaders cannot hear this and thus lead to more and more books being published with the same message? Maybe the problem is not that they don’t hear it, but that they are unable to integrate and act on the message. This could in fact be, in part, due to their personalities – that they are essentially self-centered, technocratic, un-self-aware, and really don’t care about other people. But it is also, I am sure, because these tendencies are encouraged, de facto if not de jure, by the organizations of which they are a part. After all, it was those organizations that hired them, that valued their technical skill and narcissism more than their people skill (“mistaking confidence for competence”, especially in men, as noted by Chamorro-Premuzic in the Harvard Business Review)[5], despite all evidence of every study ever done that it is the ability to manage people that makes an organization successful. Could this be projection? Are not the bosses hiring the lower-level bosses the same kinds of people? Could be.

People like to be complimented on their work, even more if they think they deserve it, and dislike being criticized, especially if they think they deserve it. Even if your boss says “Good job, Josh,” is a deadpan monotone, and you realize he has just come back from one of these “employee relations” seminars and it is not really sincere, it still feels a little good. Even if you know the person criticizing you is wrong, is completely vindictive or self-centered or has even blamed you for something someone else did, it still feels a little bad. At least to non-narcissists.

This is profoundly important. People like to be listened to. People like to be heard. Of course, people also like to get what they want, and this doesn’t always happen, and is not always a good idea. But a good leader listens and thinks about what folks are saying, because no one is as smart as a group of which they are a part. Whether the thoughts and insights of other people multiply yours by many factors or are just a little bit extra, it is more than you had alone.

Things you can do:
1.     If you are a self-important narcissist, try to change. It will be hard because you think this is why you are successful. But it is also why people hate you.
2.     If you hire leaders, don’t hire self-important narcissists. This will be hard because you might well be one yourself. Hire people who are not like you.
3.     If you work for a self-important narcissist, do not emulate them. Demonstrate how decent people act.
4.     If you want to be a leader, do it as a decent person.

It is not too hard to do this. It is not too hard to be a great leader. Partly, this is because the bar is so low. Maybe the answer is to stop hiring narcissists, certainly as leaders. Good luck on that…



[1] Sutton, RI. The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn't. Business Plus. 2007.

[2] I thought that there was a George Carlin comedy routine built upon the premise that all other drivers were “assholes”, who drove faster than you, or “jerks”, who drove slower. So you drove around muttering, alternately, “asshole”, “jerk”…but actually he said “maniacs” and “idiots”  https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Carlin
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_doctrine
[4] Denning S, ‘The Origin Of 'The World's Dumbest Idea': Milton Friedman’, Forbes June 25, 2013
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/06/26/the-origin-of-the-worlds-dumbest-idea-milton-friedman/#739938cc870e
[5] Chamorro-Premuzic T, “Why Do So Many Incompetent Men Become Leaders?”, Harvard Business Review, Aug 22, 2013,  https://hbr.org/2013/08/why-do-so-many-incompetent-men

Monday, December 3, 2018

Good views and smells in the desert



Southern Arizona, where I live, is one of the hottest and driest places in the nation. The fact that the weather is hot and dry is why a lot of people, including me, like to live here. I had enough of winter and snow (not a skier!) and especially shoveling, driving on ice, and just being unable to enjoy being outside a lot. The summers are rough, but not as much as the winters in the north (to me) and the fact that it is dry makes the heat a little more tolerable (although 110+ is still hot!).

But the dryness, while helping modify the heat in a way that you don’t get in, say, humid Florida, and good for aching joints, is much more severe when it means Not Enough Water. Not Enough Water conservation is the mantra of the desert, and requires a proactive attitude. You need to carry a lot when you hike. And if you feel the need to flush the toilet after every #1, you’re living in the wrong place. And, according to the recent climate change report issued by the federal government, it is getting worse and going to continue to. The Southwest is not just dry, with a few years of drought, it is moving into aridity, a permanent state of dryness. Thus, the impact of climate change. The wildfires devastating California and much of the West are, apparently, only going to be tempered by the eventual loss of anything that can burn.

The patterns of our rain (and we do get rain, obviously, although the average annual rainfall is less than 12”) are affected by a variety of extrinsic factors. Typically, there are two “monsoon” seasons, in the winter (mostly January and February) and in the summer (July and August), with the latter having the heavier intensity thunderstorm type rain. But El Niño and storms off the coast of Baja California, such as this October’s Hurricane Bud, also bring us rain. While October was rainy, November not so much, but a little rain in its last few days, along with colder temperatures.

This morning I walked the dog at 7, when it gets light this time of year, and it said 37 on my phone but that is the airport; another dog-walked told me it was 32 up here, but the plants didn’t freeze, so maybe the wall helps. Gotta be aware of the potential for freezing though; a sheet or towel may make the difference in whether a particular plant survives or not. Styrofoam cups can protect cactus!



But, even as wildfires ravage California and the prognosis for the desert is grim, there are the good morning walks, with clouds covering the mountains in both the morning and afternoon, and sometimes rays of sunlight peeking through, and the pungent damp morning smells of the desert (like the greasewood especially) that even my nose (not to mention Maggie’s!) can appreciate.


Monday, August 13, 2018

Rating the Comics

For many years, I have taken two local print (yes, print!) newspapers daily, the New York Times and the local paper (now in the 4th different city). In addition to the local news and sports and culture, they all offered something the Times famously does not – comics! I read them daily; if one of us is out of town, we save them up. So, I thought I’d rate the comics in my local paper, the Arizona Daily Star.

First of all, it is an OK-but-not-a-great lineup. Overall, it is worse than the Kansas City Star or the San Antonio Express-News or the Chicago Tribune. For goodness sake, it doesn’t even have Doonesbury, even on the editorial page, where it lives in some papers. I guess that it is possible that better comics are more expensive, I guess. During a recent trip to Ithaca, I remembered that, in the 1960s, the Cornell Daily Sun carried only two comics, Peanuts and Pogo. If you are going to be parsimonious, that is the way to go.

I’m going to start with the worst comics; that is easier, because I use the simple criterion of “is it funny”. There are, of course, comic “genres”, and when easily identifiable I’ll note not only how good or bad a comic is but where it fits in its own genre (considering that I will, like most people, find some genres generally less appealing). To its credit, the Arizona Daily Star does not have any of the strips that I call “soap opera” (classically also known as the “Mary Worth” type), which, in addition to an ongoing story try to draw more “lifelike” charactersalthough it does have “Mark Trail” and “Prince Valiant” on Sunday. OK, here we go:

The “Nancy” Award for “Worst comic” clearly goes to “Mutts”, a strip that has, like the award’s namesake, never been funny. “Mutts” is in the “Cutesy Animals” genre and is easily worst-in-class of even that D-league (you can read that also as D-). The Star has another animal comic in the at-least-trying-to-be-funny class, “Marmaduke” (also in the “One Panel” class), which is sometimes funny, albeit predictable. The Star does not include perennial national favorite “Garfield”, not great to me anyway.

The runner-up “worst” is clearly “Rose is Rose”, perennially unfunny and worst in the enormous class of “Comics about Families”, which the Star (as all papers) have plenty of. These include, in more or less ascending order, the generally undistinguished “Adam”, “Grand Avenue”, the enormously popular “Family Circus”, and “Baby Blues”, probably the best of the bunch. There are other strips that at least sometimes feature families but are in other classes like “Teen” and “Quirky/Witty”. The best of the bunch in the Star is only on Sunday, “Fox Trot”. In this class, I miss the Canadian strip “For Better or For Worse”, even the reruns of the entire series in the KC Star.

Another genre that has multiple representatives in the Star’s comics section is “Old People”, and two of them, “Lola” and “Crankshaft” are also runners-up for overall worst, but better than “Rose is Rose”. “Crankshaft” actually is occasionally good – funny and or incisive – but these are rare strips. “Lola” is in the sub-genre of “out-there old ladies”, and is another worst in class, being mostly mean and almost never funny, even worse than “Diamond Lil” (in the KC, not AZ, Star), and nowhere as good as Nicole Hollander’s “Sylvia”.  The Star contains “Pickles” as the best of this bunch, never really funny, and not matching the best of “Crankshaft”, but funnier on average than the latter.

Straddling the line of “Family” and “Soap Opera” but not drawn as too-lifelike, is the “Teen” (but growing older, very slowly) awful strip “Luann”, another absolutely worst-in-class, which would be at the bottom if not for the competition from “Mutts” and “Rose is Rose”. Its only interest is in finding out how many Scandinavian names it can come up with, especially for boys (Axel, Gunther, Lars and others all appear; I assume its creator must be from Minnesota).

OK, so what is good in the AZ Star comics section? We have eliminated the bulk and are left with only a few contenders. “Zits” is probably the best in the “Teen” genre but in a whole other subclass from “Luann”, and is usually pretty good. “Dilbert” is a long-time player, and is in contention for best strip, probably a bit ahead of “Pearls Before Swine”, which I put in the “Quirky/Witty” category rather than animal; PBS loses points for its frequent lazy pun-focused strips. The Star has two others in this category, “Bizarro”, an often good (but never as good as either late-lamented “The Far Side” or its closest successor, which appears in the Star on Sunday only, “Argyle Sweater”), and “Non Sequitur”. After some thought, I have decided that “Non Sequitur” (which could also, but only sometimes, be considered a Family strip) is my choice for Best Comic, edging out “Dilbert” and “PBS”. Sadly, the Star doesn’t have “Rhymes with Orange”, which is probably better.

OK, maybe you disagree with some of my ratings or choices. But they’re mine. And if you like the ones I rated lowest, good for you. I guess.

Roadrunner vs Cooper's hawk: A real life "Discovery Channel" moment!

Amazing things happen in nature, as any viewer of the Discovery channel can attest. I am not personally a viewer of that channel, but have s...